← All comparisons

On-chain analytics

MoonBase vs Nansen

On-chain wallet labeling and smart-money analytics.

The short version

Nansen tells you what wallets are doing right now. MoonBase tells you whether the protocol or token behind those wallets is worth investing in over the next 18 months — combining the on-chain signal with team, market, governance, and audit signals into one MoonScore.

Side-by-side

Both look at on-chain activity, but answer different questions.

DimensionMoonBaseNansen
Primary question answeredIs this asset investable?What is smart money doing?
Asset coverageCrypto + private + public coCrypto only
On-chain wallet labelsSurfaced via integration partnersIndustry-leading
Qualitative diligenceTeam, market, audit, governanceOut of scope
Analyst sign-offVerified human analyst on every paid tierSelf-serve dashboards
Use for IC memoDesigned for it (PDF export, embed)Requires interpretation
Real-time alertsScore-change, governance, on-chain anomalySmart-money flow alerts

Pick MoonBase when

  • You're underwriting a token or protocol, not day-trading it.
  • You want a written verdict you can attach to an IC memo.
  • Your portfolio spans crypto AND traditional private companies.

Pick Nansen when

  • You're an active on-chain trader following wallet movement.
  • You need granular labeled-wallet data for short-term alpha.

See a MoonScore on your next deal in 10 minutes.

Run AI Flash for $99 and decide for yourself whether MoonBase belongs alongside Nansen in your workflow.

Start with AI Flash

FAQ

MoonBase vs Nansen — questions we get

Other comparisons